I know that no one sells complete, pantyhose-quality body stockings, so where did this suit come from?

http://www.efcommunity.com/gallery/displ...=11&pos=10

I know you can join two pairs of pantyhose together, but I would expect to see a seam where the waistbands join. and there is no waist seam on that suit. Also, the shoulder seams look they are positioned for arms rather than legs

Is it possible to make a DIY job look this good?

Faux

jiga is a photoshop artist. His work is art. It's wonderful work, too.

Hmmm, I don't know. There are a lot of other pictures in this album where you can see waistbands etc, why bother going to the effort of photo manipulation on just a few pictures?

and if you're going to re-touch the waistband, why bother leaving the centre seam?

I don't think those images have been manipulated.

Faux

I have no idea. Isnt there anybody that could send jiga a mail?

Someone sent him an email back when he first posted his work a couple of years ago. He said he's an artist. He also said that he and his wife enjoyed practicing pantyhose encasement together. I can't remember when/where this board thread took place. It's been a while.

encasementfetish.com have a few testimonials from him. Thats the only trace of him I've seem apart from his photos. He doesn't seem to have his own website.

EF community are definitely in contact with him, though they don't have a board.

Faux

You'd be surprised! I consider myself to be an expert in photoshop and could quite easily manipulate a photo of a naked woman to give her the appearance as though she's wearing pantyhose.

I never consider myself an 'expert' in anything! -there is always more to learn!

I would agree its very easy to do this sort of thing in photoshop these days. But pre-CS2 (and I'm guessing these images are from around then) it would have taken much more time and skill.

The point I'm making is why should Jiga have gone to all the trouble! There are plenty of other images in the set with everything visible. why bother for just this one? why take out some seams but not others?

The idea that these images are manips is technically feasible, but in my opinion, not very likely.

In the end, the only one who can answer for sure is Jiga.

Faux

This post was last modified: 05-16-2009 09:04 PM by fauxsiery.

must be photoshop... here you can see the seam: http://www.efcommunity.com/gallery/displ...=11&pos=45

This post was last modified: 05-17-2009 02:58 AM by NylonMichelle.

Perhaps he's trying to create slight differences to encasements that appeal to some pantyhose fetishists who prefer seams and others who dream of seeing the ultimate, seamless encasement.